法院首次承认!一法官使用 ChatGPT 做出法庭裁决(附全文)

2023-02-09 15:07

详细内容

哥伦比亚的一名法官使用 ChatGPT 做出法庭裁决,这是第一次在人工智能文本生成器的帮助下做出法律决定。


根据一份日期为 2023 年 1 月 30 日的法庭文件,主持卡塔赫纳市第一巡回法院的法官加西亚表示,他使用人工智能工具对案件提出法律问题,并将其答复纳入他的决定。



“这项决定的论据将根据人工智能 (AI) 的使用来确定,”加西亚在从西班牙文翻译过来的决定中写道。“因此,我们输入了这些诉讼中提出的部分法律问题。”


“包括这些人工智能生成的文本的目的绝不是要取代法官的决定,”他补充说。“我们真正想要的是在证实人工智能提供的信息后优化起草判决所花费的时间。”


该案件涉及与一家健康保险公司就自闭症儿童是否应获得医疗保险的纠纷。根据法庭文件,输入人工智能工具的法律问题包括“自闭症未成年人是否可以免除为其治疗支付费用?” 以及“宪法法院的判例是否在类似案件中做出了有利的判决?”


法官还包括了他自己对适用法律先例的见解,并表示人工智能被用来“扩展已通过决定的论点”。在详细介绍了与 AI 的交流之后,法官随后将其回应和他自己的法律论据作为其决定的依据。


ChatGPT 的创建者 OpenAI 已实施过滤器以消除一些问题较多的响应。但开发人员警告说,该工具仍有很大的局限性,不应该用于后续决策。



虽然此案显然是法官首次承认使用像 ChatGPT 这样的人工智能文本生成器,但有争议的是,一些法院已经开始使用自动决策工具来确定量刑或刑事被告是否被保释。这些系统在法庭上的使用受到了 AI 伦理学家的严厉批评,他们指出,它们经常会强化种族主义和性别歧视的刻板印象,并扩大先前存在的不平等形式。尽管哥伦比亚法院的文件表明 AI 主要用于加快起草决定的速度,并且其回复经过了事实核查。


参考:

https://www.vice.com/en/article/k7bdmv/judge-used-chatgpt-to-make-court-decision?fbclid=PAAaZWRtswcGHg74QphuhMM5G969MloEeNGtm2OuuR7mVWdR8mgT5UJWWEM7U


《ChatGPT首次用于法院判决》


ChatGPT was first used for a court decision

A judge in Colombia used ChatGPT to make a court decision, and it’s probably the first time a legal decision has been made using an AI text generator — or at least the first that we’re aware of.


Judge Juan Manuel Padilla Garcia, who presides over the First Circuit Court in the city of Cartagena, said he used an AI tool to ask legal questions in the case and incorporated its answers into his decision, according to court document dated January 30, 2023.


“The arguments for this decision will be determined in line with the use of artificial intelligence (AI). Accordingly, we entered parts of the legal questions posed in these proceedings,” Garcia wrote in the decision. “The purpose of including these AI-produced texts is in no way to replace the judge’s decision. What we are really looking for is to optimize the time spent drafting judgments after corroborating the information provided by AI.”


The case involved a dispute with a health insurance company over whether an autistic child should receive coverage for medical treatment. According to the court document, the legal questions entered into the AI tool included “Is an autistic minor exonerated from paying fees for their therapies?” and “Has the jurisprudence of the constitutional court made favorable decisions in similar cases?”


Garcia included the chatbot’s full responses in the ruling, apparently the first time a judge has admitted to doing so. The judge also included his own reflections on applicable legal precedents and said AI was used to “extend the arguments of the adopted decision.” After a detailed discussion with the AI, the judge accepts its answers and his own legal arguments as a basis for making a decision.


Colombian law does not prohibit the use of artificial intelligence in judicial decisions, but systems such as ChatGPT are notorious for producing biased, discriminatory or simply wrong answers. This is because the language model has no real understanding of the text — it simply synthesizes sentences based on probability from the millions of examples used to train the system. (来源:Mezha)


来源:“三次方AIRX“微信公众号

评论列表(0)
暂无提问

发表提问 取消回复